Slavick v. HPA/Hawai'i Paroling Authority
This text of Slavick v. HPA/Hawai'i Paroling Authority (Slavick v. HPA/Hawai'i Paroling Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 17-MAR-2023 11:02 AM Dkt. 5 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ________________________________________________________________
CHRIS SLAVICK, Petitioner,
vs.
HPA/HAWAIʻI PAROLING AUTHORITY; EDMUND HYUN; CLAYTON HEE; GENE DEMELLO; and DPS/HCF STAFF, Respondents. ________________________________________________________________
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (1PC041001534) ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus filed on March 13, 2023, and the record, Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to relief, nor a lack of alternative means to seek relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawaiʻi 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999). It is ordered that the petition is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, March 17, 2023. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Todd W. Eddins
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Slavick v. HPA/Hawai'i Paroling Authority, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slavick-v-hpahawaii-paroling-authority-haw-2023.