Slavick v. Halawa Correctional Facility Administrative Staff

CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 27, 2021
DocketSCPW-21-0000592
StatusPublished

This text of Slavick v. Halawa Correctional Facility Administrative Staff (Slavick v. Halawa Correctional Facility Administrative Staff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Slavick v. Halawa Correctional Facility Administrative Staff, (haw 2021).

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 27-DEC-2021 11:04 AM Dkt. 4 ODDP

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

CHRIS SLAVICK, Petitioner

vs.

HALAWA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF; GARY KAPLAN; JAN MOLINA; LYLE ANTONIO; SCOTT HARRINGTON; ALICIA TORRES; MONICA CHUN; and CALVIN MOCK, Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CASE NO. 1PC041001534; CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus

filed by petitioner Christopher Lee Slavick, it appears that,

based on the information presented, petitioner fails to

demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to the requested

relief or that respondents are refusing to perform a clear and

precise duty that is owed to petitioner. Petitioner, therefore,

is not entitled to an extraordinary writ. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91

Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is

an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner

demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or

obtain the requested action); Barnett v. Broderick, 84 Hawai#i

109, 111, 929 P.2d 1359, 1361 (1996) (mandamus relief is

available to compel an official to perform a duty allegedly owed

to an individual only if the individual’s claim is clear and

certain, the official’s duty is ministerial and so plainly

prescribed as to be free from doubt, and no other remedy is

available). Accordingly,

It is ordered that the petition for writ of mandamus is

denied.

It is further ordered that the clerk of the appellate

court shall process the petition for writ of mandamus without

payment of the filing fee.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 27, 2021.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kema v. Gaddis
982 P.2d 334 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1999)
Barnett v. Broderick
929 P.2d 1359 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Slavick v. Halawa Correctional Facility Administrative Staff, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slavick-v-halawa-correctional-facility-administrative-staff-haw-2021.