Slavick v. Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided June 2, 2025·No. SCPW-25-0000046·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 02-JUN-2025 08:36 AM Dkt. 5 ODDP

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ________________________________________________________________

CHRIS SLAVICK, Petitioner,

vs.

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION; and TERI YOSHINAGA, Respondents. ________________________________________________________________

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus

filed January 24, 2025, and the record, Petitioner has not

demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to relief, nor a

lack of alternative means to seek the relief sought in this

original proceeding. An extraordinary writ is unwarranted. See

Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawaiʻi 307, 319, 537

P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023). It is ordered that the petition is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, June 2, 2025.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

/s/ Vladimir P. Devens

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Slavick v. Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, (haw 2025).

Slavick v. Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (Slavick v. Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Womble Bond Dickinson v. Kim
537 P.3d 1154 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 2023)