Slavick v. Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
This text of Slavick v. Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (Slavick v. Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 02-JUN-2025 08:36 AM Dkt. 5 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ________________________________________________________________
CHRIS SLAVICK, Petitioner,
vs.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION; and TERI YOSHINAGA, Respondents. ________________________________________________________________
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus
filed January 24, 2025, and the record, Petitioner has not
demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to relief, nor a
lack of alternative means to seek the relief sought in this
original proceeding. An extraordinary writ is unwarranted. See
Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawaiʻi 307, 319, 537
P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023). It is ordered that the petition is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, June 2, 2025.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Slavick v. Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slavick-v-department-of-corrections-and-rehabilitation-haw-2025.