Slaughter v. Yoakum County

195 S.W. 1129, 109 Tex. 42, 1917 Tex. LEXIS 117
Texas Supreme Court·Decided June 11, 1917·No. No. 2645.·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinions

The plaintiff in error, holding under the patent of the State, has a lawful and complete title to the land in controversy unless the Act of March 26, 1881, amounted to an irrevocable grant on the part of the State to the unorganized counties of the State. We think the effect of that Act was to create a reservation for the benefit of such counties and that it was not a grant; and it was, therefore, within the power of the Legislature to deal with the reservation as was done by the Act of the succeeding Legislature in 1883, under which latter Act the patent was issued under which the plaintiff in error holds.

The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is reversed and the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

The opinion in the case will be later filed.

Filed May 17, 1916.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Slaughter v. Yoakum County, 195 S.W. 1129, 109 Tex. 42, 1917 Tex. LEXIS 117 (Tex. 1917).

195 S.W. 1129 (Slaughter v. Yoakum County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reed v. State Department of Licensing & Regulation
820 S.W.2d 1 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Calvert v. Humble Oil & Refining Company
404 S.W.2d 147 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1966)
State v. Aransas Dock and Channel Company
365 S.W.2d 220 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1963)
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1957
Stephens County v. Hefner
16 S.W.2d 804 (Texas Supreme Court, 1929)
City of Dallas v. Texas Employers' Ins.
245 S.W. 946 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1922)
State v. Houston & T. C. Ry. Co.
209 S.W. 820 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1918)