Slaughter v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Slaughter v. State

860 S.W.2d 844, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1348, 1993 WL 327143

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 31, 1993·No. No. 63361·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Demetrius Slaughter, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The judgment of conviction sought to be vacated was for illegal sale of cocaine near a school and possession of a controlled substance (cocaine) for which movant was sentenced on his plea of guilty to imprisonment for a total of ten years.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Demetrius Slaughter, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The judgment of conviction sought to be vacated was for illegal sale of cocaine near a school and possession of a controlled substance (cocaine) for which movant was sentenced on his plea of guilty to imprisonment for a total of ten years.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Slaughter v. State, 860 S.W.2d 844, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1348, 1993 WL 327143 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

860 S.W.2d 844 (Slaughter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.