Slaughter v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Slaughter v. State

212 So. 2d 918, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5393

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 6, 1968

DocketNo. J-369

StatusPublished

This text of 212 So. 2d 918 (Slaughter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Slaughter v. State, 212 So. 2d 918, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5393 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Appellant has appealed from a judgment and sentence entered after he was found guilty by a jury of entering without breaking with intent to commit a misdemeanor. Appellant has raised as his sole point on appeal the question of whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain a conviction for the crime which the jury found that he committed. After careful reading of the testimony in this case we feel convinced that there is competent substantial evidence which, if believed by the jury, is sufficient to support the judgment and sentence appealed. Therefore, we hereby- af[919]*919firm the judgment and sentence entered by the lower court. Lee v. State, 153 So.2d 351 (Fla.App. 1st 1963); Hicks v. State, 138 So.2d 101 (Fla.App.2d 1962).

WIGGINTON, C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Appellant has appealed from a judgment and sentence entered after he was found guilty by a jury of entering without breaking with intent to commit a misdemeanor. Appellant has raised as his sole point on appeal the question of whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain a conviction for the crime which the jury found that he committed. After careful reading of the testimony in this case we feel convinced that there is competent substantial evidence which, if believed by the jury, is sufficient to support the judgment and sentence appealed. Therefore, we hereby- af[919]*919firm the judgment and sentence entered by the lower court. Lee v. State, 153 So.2d 351 (Fla.App. 1st 1963); Hicks v. State, 138 So.2d 101 (Fla.App.2d 1962).

WIGGINTON, C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 So. 2d 918, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slaughter-v-state-fladistctapp-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack