Slaughter v. State
This text of 557 So. 2d 34 (Slaughter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Thomas Wayne SLAUGHTER, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer and Paula S. Saunders, Asst. Public Defenders, Tallahassee, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and A.E. (Ned) Pooser, IV, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
We accepted Slaughter v. State, 538 So.2d 509 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), for review based on apparent conflict with Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla. 1987). Upon examination of the record and consideration of argument by counsel, we have determined that jurisdiction was granted improvidently. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ENTERTAINED BY THIS COURT.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
557 So. 2d 34, 1990 WL 26378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slaughter-v-state-fla-1990.