Slaughter v. Slaughter
389 S.E.2d 803, 326 N.C. 479, 1990 N.C. LEXIS 154
Opinion
After hearing arguments and carefully considering the new briefs and record, we conclude that we improvidently allowed defendant’s petition for discretionary review. The result is, therefore:
Discretionary review improvidently allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Slaughter v. Slaughter, 389 S.E.2d 803, 326 N.C. 479, 1990 N.C. LEXIS 154 (N.C. 1990).
389 S.E.2d 803 (Slaughter v. Slaughter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lake Colony Construction, Inc. v. Boyd
711 S.E.2d 742 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2011)
Griffin Mgmt. Corp. v. Carolina Power & Light Co.
2009 NCBC 27 (North Carolina Business Court, 2009)
Wood v. McDonald's Corp.
603 S.E.2d 539 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
Rhoney v. Fele
518 S.E.2d 536 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1999)
Jones v. Shoji
428 S.E.2d 865 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1993)