Slaughter v. Ripperdan

15 Ky. 337, 5 Litt. 337, 1824 Ky. LEXIS 106
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedJune 14, 1824
StatusPublished

This text of 15 Ky. 337 (Slaughter v. Ripperdan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Slaughter v. Ripperdan, 15 Ky. 337, 5 Litt. 337, 1824 Ky. LEXIS 106 (Ky. Ct. App. 1824).

Opinion

[337]*337Opinion of the Court,

by Ch. J. Boyle.

Although the writ in this case had issued one defendant alone, yet it was erroneous to render judgment against him only, when the declaration wias jointly against him and another, upon a joint by both; and as the plaintiff, having stated his whole cause of action against both, would be barred by the judgment against one, from maintaining his against the other, he is thereby prejudiced, and though [338]*338the judgment is for him, he may well bring his writ of error t0 reverse I*1,

The judgment must be reversed with costs, and the cause be remanded, that the suit may be dismissed at cos|- 0f j.jje plaintiff there.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 Ky. 337, 5 Litt. 337, 1824 Ky. LEXIS 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slaughter-v-ripperdan-kyctapp-1824.