Slaughter v. Mexican Land & Colonization Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Slaughter v. Mexican Land & Colonization Co.

149 S.W. 1193, 1912 Tex. App. LEXIS 773

DecidedMay 18, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 149 S.W. 1193 (Slaughter v. Mexican Land & Colonization Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Slaughter v. Mexican Land & Colonization Co., 149 S.W. 1193, 1912 Tex. App. LEXIS 773 (Tex. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PRESLER, J.

This is a suit by appellee to recover on a claim against appellants for royalty on certain wood, alleged to have been furnished appellants and cut from appellee’s land at Alamo, Lower California, republic of Mexico, and for certain messages sent and received by appellants over appellee’s telephone and telegraph lines, situated in the same locality. Ap-pellee recovered a verdict and judgment in the trial court for the amount of its claim, and appellants appeal, and here assign numerous errors, all of which having been duly considered, we are of the opinion that no reversible error is presented under any or either of them; and, being further of the opinion that the charge of the court fairly presents the law of the ease under the pleadings and the evidence, and that the verdict and judgment rendered is warranted under the law and the evidence, we conclude that the judgment appealed from should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRESLER, J.

This is a suit by appellee to recover on a claim against appellants for royalty on certain wood, alleged to have been furnished appellants and cut from appellee’s land at Alamo, Lower California, republic of Mexico, and for certain messages sent and received by appellants over appellee’s telephone and telegraph lines, situated in the same locality. Ap-pellee recovered a verdict and judgment in the trial court for the amount of its claim, and appellants appeal, and here assign numerous errors, all of which having been duly considered, we are of the opinion that no reversible error is presented under any or either of them; and, being further of the opinion that the charge of the court fairly presents the law of the ease under the pleadings and the evidence, and that the verdict and judgment rendered is warranted under the law and the evidence, we conclude that the judgment appealed from should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 S.W. 1193, 1912 Tex. App. LEXIS 773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slaughter-v-mexican-land-colonization-co-texapp-1912.