Slaughter v. City of Lagrange

7 S.E.2d 785, 62 Ga. App. 313, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 647
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 11, 1940
Docket28093.
StatusPublished

This text of 7 S.E.2d 785 (Slaughter v. City of Lagrange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Slaughter v. City of Lagrange, 7 S.E.2d 785, 62 Ga. App. 313, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 647 (Ga. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

Guerry, J.

The present petition for certiorari alleges that on April 12, 1939, the petitioner was convicted in the recorder’s court of the City of LaGrange, charged with a violation of a named and quoted ordinance of that city. It is further alleged that heretofore, on May 5, 1939, he presented a petition for certiorari, complaining of his conviction. The judge refused to sanction the petition. A writ of error to this court was taken, and on September 7, 1939, this court affirmed the judgment of the superior court, placing its decision on the ground that the petition for certiorari failed to set out the provisions of any ordinance for the violation of which the defendant was tried. 60 Ga. App. 555 (4 S. E. 2d, 410). The present petition was filed on September 15, 1939. It does not affirmatively appear in the present petition on what ground the first petition was dismissed. This court decided that the first petition for certiorari set out no cause of action or ground for sanction, in that no ordinance was pleaded. It was therefore void. See Opinion in that case. If void, it could not be renewed. In Citizens Banking Co. v. Paris, 119 Ga. 517 (46 S. E. 638), it was said that where a petition for certiorari does not plainly and distinctly set out any assignment of error on a ruling or decision of the inferior judicatory it is void. A void petition for certiorari may not be renewed after thirty days from the decision complained of. Morris v. Battey, 31 Ga. App. 438 (121 S. E. 125), and cit.; Hamilton v. Phenix Insurance Co., 111 Ga. 875 (36 S. E. 960); Talley v. Commercial Credit Co., 173 Ga. 828, 830 (161 S. E. 832), and cit. *314 The court did not err in refusing to sanction the second petitipn for certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hamilton & Co. v. Phenix Insurance
36 S.E. 960 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)
Citizens Banking Co. v. Paris
46 S.E. 638 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Talley v. Commercial Credit Co.
161 S.E. 832 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Morris v. Battey
121 S.E. 125 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 S.E.2d 785, 62 Ga. App. 313, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slaughter-v-city-of-lagrange-gactapp-1940.