Slattery v. Sterling Hotel Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Slattery v. Sterling Hotel Co.

39 A.2d 161, 156 Pa. Super. 82, 1944 Pa. Super. LEXIS 521

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedSeptember 27, 1944

DocketAppeal, 19

StatusPublished

This text of 39 A.2d 161 (Slattery v. Sterling Hotel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Slattery v. Sterling Hotel Co., 39 A.2d 161, 156 Pa. Super. 82, 1944 Pa. Super. LEXIS 521 (Pa. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

‘Peb Curiam,

There is no substantial difference between the clause in the mortgage given by the defendant corporation, and relied on by it in this appeal, and the corresponding clause in the mortgage passed upon by the Supreme Court in Putnam v. Pittsburgh Railways Co., 330 Pa. 210, 199 A. 211. That decision justifies the action of the court below.

The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Aponick,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

‘Peb Curiam,

There is no substantial difference between the clause in the mortgage given by the defendant corporation, and relied on by it in this appeal, and the corresponding clause in the mortgage passed upon by the Supreme Court in Putnam v. Pittsburgh Railways Co., 330 Pa. 210, 199 A. 211. That decision justifies the action of the court below.

The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Aponick,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 A.2d 161, 156 Pa. Super. 82, 1944 Pa. Super. LEXIS 521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slattery-v-sterling-hotel-co-pasuperct-1944.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack