Slattery v. Kerbstone Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Slattery v. Kerbstone Realty Corp.

198 A.D. 945

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 15, 1921·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Rich and Jaycox, JJ., concur; Putnam, J., concurs on the ground that the question of a nuisance was a matter for the jury, and the verdict was sustained by the effort to cover the spindle with a box before the accident; Kelly, J., dissents on the ground that the facts did not justify the finding that the spindle in question constituted a nuisance (MacRae v. Chelsea Fibre Mills, 145 App. Div. 588), with whom Blaekmar, P. J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Rich and Jaycox, JJ., concur; Putnam, J., concurs on the ground that the question of a nuisance was a matter for the jury, and the verdict was sustained by the effort to cover the spindle with a box before the accident; Kelly, J., dissents on the ground that the facts did not justify the finding that the spindle in question constituted a nuisance (MacRae v. Chelsea Fibre Mills, 145 App. Div. 588), with whom Blaekmar, P. J., concurs.

Slattery v. Kerbstone Realty Corp., 198 A.D. 945 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

198 A.D. 945 (Slattery v. Kerbstone Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related