Slattery Associates, Inc. v. Tully

426 N.E.2d 472, 54 N.Y.2d 711, 442 N.Y.S.2d 978, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2637
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 6, 1981·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

[713] OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

With respect to the piping we do not reach any question of inconsistency with other commission rulings since the complaint alleged, petitioner’s expert testified and the hearing officer found that the piping was furnished to petitioner by the owner. As to the piping, therefore, petitioner, having paid no tax, has no right to a credit. As concerns the other materials used to construct the generator foundation, we concur with the reasoning of the Appellate Division memorandum (79 AD2d 761).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Slattery Associates, Inc. v. Tully, 426 N.E.2d 472, 54 N.Y.2d 711, 442 N.Y.S.2d 978, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2637 (N.Y. 1981).

426 N.E.2d 472 (Slattery Associates, Inc. v. Tully) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

D. S. Alamo Associates v. Commissioner of Finance
520 N.E.2d 542 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
Dental Society v. New York State Tax Commission
110 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Callanan Marine Corp. v. Tax State Commission
98 A.D.2d 555 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)