Slater v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co.

282 A.D.2d 445, 722 N.Y.S.2d 407, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3291
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 2, 2001·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Marlow, J.), dated June 20, 2000, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In support of their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, the defendants made a prima facie showing that they neither created the allegedly dangerous condition nor had actual or constructive notice of it. In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see, Marukos v Waldbaums, Inc., 267 AD2d 434; Sims v Waldbaum, Inc., 246 AD2d 642; Cuddy v Waldbaum, Inc., 230 AD2d 703). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted the motion. Santucci, J. P., Altman, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Slater v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co., 282 A.D.2d 445, 722 N.Y.S.2d 407, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3291 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

282 A.D.2d 445 (Slater v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tiano v. Nick's Lobster & Seafood Restaurant & Clam Bar
300 A.D.2d 469 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Gloria v. MGM Emerald Enterprises, Inc.
298 A.D.2d 355 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)