Slater v. . Stewart

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Slater v. . Stewart

31 S.E. 1005, 123 N.C. 112, 1898 N.C. LEXIS 25

DecidedOctober 25, 1898

StatusPublished

This text of 31 S.E. 1005 (Slater v. . Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Slater v. . Stewart, 31 S.E. 1005, 123 N.C. 112, 1898 N.C. LEXIS 25 (N.C. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Porches, J.:

The facts governing this case are substantially the same as those in the case of Mahoney v. *113 Stewart, at this Term. This was admitted by counsel on the argument here.

This being so, this case is governed by that case. Therefore, the injunction and order appointing a receiver are continued as to the defendant Stewart, but are dissolved and vacated as to the administrator Bras-well and the administration of his intestate’s estate.

The judgment appealed from will be so modified, but the plaintiffs will be taxed with the costs of this appeal.

Modified and affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Porches, J.:

The facts governing this case are substantially the same as those in the case of Mahoney v. *113 Stewart, at this Term. This was admitted by counsel on the argument here.

This being so, this case is governed by that case. Therefore, the injunction and order appointing a receiver are continued as to the defendant Stewart, but are dissolved and vacated as to the administrator Bras-well and the administration of his intestate’s estate.

The judgment appealed from will be so modified, but the plaintiffs will be taxed with the costs of this appeal.

Modified and affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 S.E. 1005, 123 N.C. 112, 1898 N.C. LEXIS 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slater-v-stewart-nc-1898.