Slater v. . Stewart

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Slater v. . Stewart

31 S.E. 1005, 123 N.C. 112, 1898 N.C. LEXIS 25

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 25, 1898·Published

Opinion

Porches, J.:

The facts governing this case are substantially the same as those in the case of Mahoney v. *113 Stewart, at this Term. This was admitted by counsel on the argument here.

This being so, this case is governed by that case. Therefore, the injunction and order appointing a receiver are continued as to the defendant Stewart, but are dissolved and vacated as to the administrator Bras-well and the administration of his intestate’s estate.

The judgment appealed from will be so modified, but the plaintiffs will be taxed with the costs of this appeal.

Modified and affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Porches, J.:

The facts governing this case are substantially the same as those in the case of Mahoney v. *113 Stewart, at this Term. This was admitted by counsel on the argument here.

This being so, this case is governed by that case. Therefore, the injunction and order appointing a receiver are continued as to the defendant Stewart, but are dissolved and vacated as to the administrator Bras-well and the administration of his intestate’s estate.

The judgment appealed from will be so modified, but the plaintiffs will be taxed with the costs of this appeal.

Modified and affirmed.

Slater v. . Stewart, 31 S.E. 1005, 123 N.C. 112, 1898 N.C. LEXIS 25 (N.C. 1898).

Pincite

31 S.E. 1005 (Slater v. . Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.