Slater v. Smith

117 Mass. 96, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 163
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 19, 1875·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

It is settled by the decisions of this court that the contract signed by the defendant was a sufficient memorandum to take the case out of the statute of frauds, even if not signed by or in behalf of the plaintiffs. Mead v. Parker, 115 Mass. 413. Old Colony Railroad v. Evans, 6 Gray, 25. It is impossible to see, upon this demurrer, that competent paroi evidence would not identify the estate intended, as the only one which would satisfy the description. Under the prayer of the bill, the court may mould the relief according to the circum stances which may appear at the hearing.

Demurrer overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Slater v. Smith, 117 Mass. 96, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 163 (Mass. 1875).

117 Mass. 96 (Slater v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Forman v. Gadouas
142 N.E. 87 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1924)
Edwards v. Phillips
1918 OK 245 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1918)
McMahon v. Plumb
92 A. 113 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1914)
Record v. Littlefield
106 N.E. 142 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1914)
Harrigan v. Dodge
86 N.E. 780 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1909)
Vance v. Newman
80 S.W. 574 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1904)
Haskell v. Tukesbury
43 A. 500 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1899)
O'Brien v. Boland
44 N.E. 602 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1896)
New England Dressed Meat & Wool Co. v. Standard Worsted Co.
43 N.E. 112 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1896)
Doherty v. Hill
11 N.E. 581 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1887)
Lente v. Clarke
22 Fla. 515 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1886)
Williams v. Robinson
73 Me. 186 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1882)
Eggleston v. Wagner
46 Mich. 612 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1881)