Slater v. North Jersey Street Railway Co.
74 A. 511, 78 N.J.L. 559, 49 Vroom 559, 1909 N.J. LEXIS 264
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion filed in that court.
[560]*560For affirmance — Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Dill, Congdon, JJ. 11.
For reversal — ÍTone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Slater v. North Jersey Street Railway Co., 74 A. 511, 78 N.J.L. 559, 49 Vroom 559, 1909 N.J. LEXIS 264 (N.J. 1909).
74 A. 511 (Slater v. North Jersey Street Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.