Slater v. Kenny

265 A.D. 963, 38 N.Y.S.2d 595, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6757
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 1942·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The findings and conclusions are reversed and plaintiff’s proposed findings of fact numbered First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth and the proposed conclusions of law numbered First, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth are found. The finding of the trial court of the defendant’s marriage to one Kroell previous to her marriage to the plaintiff, and that such marriage had not been annulled or dissolved at the time that she went through the marriage ceremony with the plaintiff is amply supported by the evidence and under the facts here the plaintiff has established that he is entitled to relief. (Davis v. Davis, 279 N. Y. 657.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur. [176 Misc. 690.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Slater v. Kenny, 265 A.D. 963, 38 N.Y.S.2d 595, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6757 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

265 A.D. 963 (Slater v. Kenny) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Presbrey v. Presbrey
6 A.D.2d 477 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
Villafana v. Villafana
275 A.D.2d 810 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)
Honig v. Honig
181 Misc. 251 (New York Supreme Court, 1943)
Heusner v. Heusner
181 Misc. 1015 (New York Supreme Court, 1943)