Slater v. Davis
This text of 163 S.E. 704 (Slater v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. In Davidson v. Citizens Bank of Fort Valley, 171 Ga. 81 (154 S. E. 775), it was held: “A stockholder in an insolvent bank can not set off the amount of his individual deposits against his statutory liability to depositors of the bank. The request to review and overrule the decision in Swicord v. Crawford, 148 Ga. 719 (98 S. E. 343), is refused.” That ruling controls in this case. Counsel for the plaintiff in error formally request that both of the decisions just mentioned, and that of Reed v. Mobley, 172 Ga. 116 (157 S. E. 321), be reviewed and overruled. The request is denied.
2. With reference to the constitutional questions raised in the petition, the only discussion in the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error is, viz.: “Plaintiff in error respectfully urges that the allegations in her bill in [634]*634paragraphs 16, 17, and 18,” in which the constitutional questions are raised, “present proper questions for determination in this cause, and that said section should be held, as we verily believe to be, violative” of the sections of the constitution as stated in the petition. No authorities are cited and no elaboration of the reasons stated in the petition by way of argument are set forth in the brief. Held, that the statute is not unconstitutional for any reason assigned.
3. The court did not err in sustaining the general demurrer to the petition.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
163 S.E. 704, 174 Ga. 633, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slater-v-davis-ga-1932.