Slater v. Bledsoe

Fourth Circuit

Slater v. Bledsoe

122 F. App'x 678

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 8, 2005·No. No. 04-7793·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Herbert Slater appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) com[679]*679plaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Slater’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Slater v. Bledsoe, No. CA-04-21949-3-13BC (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Herbert Slater appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) com[679]*679plaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Slater’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Slater v. Bledsoe, No. CA-04-21949-3-13BC (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Slater v. Bledsoe, 122 F. App'x 678 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

122 F. App'x 678 (Slater v. Bledsoe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related