Slater Steels Corp. v. United States

2004 CIT 63
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Slater Steels Corp. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 316 F. Supp. 2d 1368
United States Court of International Trade·Decided June 9, 2004·No. Consol. 02-00189·Published

Opinion

Slip Op. 04-63

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

BEFORE: RICHARD W. GOLDBERG, SENIOR JUDGE

SLATER STEELS CORP., FORT WAYNE SPECIALITY ALLOYS DIVISION; CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP., CRUCIBLE SPECIALTY METALS DIVISION, CRUCIBLE MATERIALS CORP.; ELECTRALLOY CORP.; UNITED STEEL WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO/CLC; ACCIAIERIE VALBRUNA S.P.A.,

Plaintiffs, Consolidated Court No. 02-00189

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant,

and

TRAFILERIE BEDINI, SRL,

Defendant- Intervenor.

JUDGMENT ORDER

Upon consideration of the Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to United States Court of International Trade Remand Order (“Redetermination Results”) filed by the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) pursuant to the Court’s decision in Slater Steels Corp. v. United States, Slip Op. 03-162 (Dec. 16, 2003), and upon the parties’ comments regarding the Redetermination Results; upon all other papers filed herein, and upon due deliberation; the Court finds that Commerce adequately distinguished the five administrative determinations cited in the Court’s remand instructions. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Redetermination Results are sustained in all respects; and it is further

ORDERED that judgment is entered for defendant.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Richard W. Goldberg Richard W. Goldberg Senior Judge

Date: June 9, 2004 New York, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Slater Steels Corp. v. United States, 2004 CIT 63 (cit 2004).

2004 CIT 63 (Slater Steels Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.