Slate v. Rice

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Slate v. Rice

936 So. 2d 757, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14418, 2006 WL 2474022

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 29, 2006

DocketNo. 1D06-4363

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 936 So. 2d 757 (Slate v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Slate v. Rice, 936 So. 2d 757, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14418, 2006 WL 2474022 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Spencer Slate brought an action in the Circuit Court for Leon County, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief based on a claim that David Rice had violated the Resign to Run Law, section 99.012, Florida Statutes (2006), and asking that Rice’s name be removed from the ballot as a Republican Party candidate for the Florida House of Representatives in District 120. Judgment was entered for defendant Rice and Slate appeals. We have carefully read the briefs of the parties and the order of the circuit court, and reviewed the applicable law. It is our conclusion that the reasoning and the result of the circuit court are correct and, accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

ALLEN, WEBSTER, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Spencer Slate brought an action in the Circuit Court for Leon County, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief based on a claim that David Rice had violated the Resign to Run Law, section 99.012, Florida Statutes (2006), and asking that Rice’s name be removed from the ballot as a Republican Party candidate for the Florida House of Representatives in District 120. Judgment was entered for defendant Rice and Slate appeals. We have carefully read the briefs of the parties and the order of the circuit court, and reviewed the applicable law. It is our conclusion that the reasoning and the result of the circuit court are correct and, accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

ALLEN, WEBSTER, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

936 So. 2d 757, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14418, 2006 WL 2474022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slate-v-rice-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack