Slate v. Fredonia Central School District

256 A.D.2d 1210, 682 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14377
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 31, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 256 A.D.2d 1210 (Slate v. Fredonia Central School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Slate v. Fredonia Central School District, 256 A.D.2d 1210, 682 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14377 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Although defendant presented sufficient evidence to entitle it to summary judgment dismissing the complaint, plaintiff raised questions of fact concerning causation, notice and the existence of a dangerous condition on the stair in defendant’s school where plaintiff’s son fell, thereby warranting denial of defendant’s motion (see generally, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562).

Although slight differences in elevation have been held to be nonactionable (see, Morales v Riverbay Corp., 226 AD2d 271; see also, Julian v Sementelli, 234 AD2d 866; Guerrieri v Summa, 193 AD2d 647), the same cases also hold that even a trivial height differential may be actionable where the defect constitutes a trap, snare, or nuisance. Plaintiff submitted an affidavit of a licensed engineer whose opinion it was that the repair in the stair constituted a trap, notwithstanding its minimal height differential, because the depression in the front part of the repair was not readily observable under normal [1211]*1211conditions, thus creating a question of fact whether the defect constituted a dangerous condition.

The remaining contentions of defendant lack merit or are not preserved for our review (see, Walker v Huber, 254 AD2d 734; Matter of Rodgers v Crumb, 242 AD2d 874). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Gerace, J.— Summary Judgment.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Wisner, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meldrim v. Holiday Meadows, LLC
2024 NY Slip Op 01633 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
The People v. Thomas Barnes
New York Court of Appeals, 2015
Hutchinson v. Sheridan Hill House Corp.
41 N.E.3d 766 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
Czochanski v. Tishman Speyer Properties, Ltd.
45 F. App'x 45 (Second Circuit, 2002)
Argenio v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority
277 A.D.2d 165 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
256 A.D.2d 1210, 682 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slate-v-fredonia-central-school-district-nyappdiv-1998.