Slate v. Brown
This text of 256 So. 2d 64 (Slate v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiffs in the trial court appeal a summary final judgment for the defendants upon a complaint alleging fraud in the sale of stock in a corporation to be formed. The judgment is supported by the depositions of the plaintiffs where it appears that the corporation was formed and one of the appellants participated as an officer until losses were encountered. The testimony of the plaintiffs fails to support the allegations of their complaint. In [65]*65addition, it affirmatively appears that there is no further evidence of the alleged fraud available for trial. See Lane v. Cohen, Fla. App.1967, 201 So.2d 804 for the rule that a summary judgment will' be affirmed where the depositions demonstrate that the appellant is completely without proofs to sustain his complaint.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
256 So. 2d 64, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slate-v-brown-fladistctapp-1971.