Slappy v. Diehl

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: July 20, 2001
• Docket: 01-6684
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6684

ISAAC EUGENE SLAPPY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

JEFFERY RAY ADDY; MANSA MUSA BANSHEE,

Plaintiffs,

versus

J. BRYANT DIEHL; TOP REPUBLIC TOBACCO,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 01-6795

JEFFERY RAY ADDY,

ISAAC EUGENE SLAPPY; MANSA MUSA BANSHEE,

Plaintiffs, versus

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-99-3125-3-18BC)

Submitted: July 12, 2001 Decided: July 20, 2001

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Isaac Eugene Slappy, Jeffery Ray Addy, Appellants Pro Se. Terry B. Millar, TERRY B. MILLAR, L.L.C., Rock Hill, South Carolina; Thomas Frank Dougall, BOWERS, ORR & DOUGALL, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

2 PER CURIAM:

Isaac Eugene Slappy and Jeffery Ray Addy appeal the district

court’s orders denying relief on their motions for relief from

judgment. We have reviewed the records and the district court’s

opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. Addy v. Diehl, No. CA-99-

3125-3-18BC (D.S.C. filed Mar. 22, 2001; entered Mar. 23, 2001;

filed and entered Mar. 26, 2001). We deny Addy’s motion for

appointment of counsel on appeal. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED