Slakter v. Kocaj
This text of 234 A.D. 649 (Slakter v. Kocaj) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event, on the ground that a question of fact was presented for the determination of the jury as to whether the clause in the assignment relating to a guaranty of payment was inserted through fraud. All concur, except Edgcomb and Crosby, JJ., who dissent and vote for modification by striking from the judgment the provision requiring plaintiff to surrender the notes upon payment of the judgment, and for affirmance as so modified, without costs. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Edgcomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
234 A.D. 649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slakter-v-kocaj-nyappdiv-1931.