Slaight v. Kaiser

Supreme Court of Kansas

Slaight v. Kaiser

132 P. 1007, 90 Kan. 161, 1913 Kan. LEXIS 180

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedJune 7, 1913

DocketNo. 18,256

StatusPublished

This text of 132 P. 1007 (Slaight v. Kaiser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Slaight v. Kaiser, 132 P. 1007, 90 Kan. 161, 1913 Kan. LEXIS 180 (kan 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This was an action in replevin brought by Slaight against Kaiser to recover possession of five horses and two mules. The case depended upon two questions of fact: (1) Had the horses trespassed upon the premises of appellant and caused' damage to him? (2) Were the horses about to do the appellant damage when taken up? The questions were fairly submitted to the jury in the instructions. Upon sufficient evidence the jury found in favor of the appellee and the verdict was approved by the court.

'The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

This was an action in replevin brought by Slaight against Kaiser to recover possession of five horses and two mules. The case depended upon two questions of fact: (1) Had the horses trespassed upon the premises of appellant and caused' damage to him? (2) Were the horses about to do the appellant damage when taken up? The questions were fairly submitted to the jury in the instructions. Upon sufficient evidence the jury found in favor of the appellee and the verdict was approved by the court.

'The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 P. 1007, 90 Kan. 161, 1913 Kan. LEXIS 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slaight-v-kaiser-kan-1913.