Slagle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Slagle v. State

716 So. 2d 806, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8477, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1679

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 15, 1998

DocketNo. 97-3477

StatusPublished

This text of 716 So. 2d 806 (Slagle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Slagle v. State, 716 So. 2d 806, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8477, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1679 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to suppress. Viewing the evidence and reasonable inferences in a light most favorable to sustaining the order, we find that the state never established that appellant was in such proximity to the area where the evidence was discovered to justify the search and seizure as incident to lawful arrest.

MINER, WOLF and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to suppress. Viewing the evidence and reasonable inferences in a light most favorable to sustaining the order, we find that the state never established that appellant was in such proximity to the area where the evidence was discovered to justify the search and seizure as incident to lawful arrest.

MINER, WOLF and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

716 So. 2d 806, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8477, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slagle-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.