Slagle & Co. v. Amberson

15 A. 427, 1 Monag. 30, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 712
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 1, 1888·No. No. 17·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The court below properly held that the guaranty in suit was a revocable instrument, and that the death of the guarantor revoked it.

The judgment is affirmed. J. C. S.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Slagle & Co. v. Amberson, 15 A. 427, 1 Monag. 30, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 712 (Pa. 1888).

15 A. 427 (Slagle & Co. v. Amberson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lorch's Estate
131 A. 381 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)