Slade v. State

54 S.E. 750, 125 Ga. 788, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 273
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 3, 1906
StatusPublished

This text of 54 S.E. 750 (Slade v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Slade v. State, 54 S.E. 750, 125 Ga. 788, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 273 (Ga. 1906).

Opinion

Cobb, P. J.

1. A demurrer to an indictment which charged the accused with playing and betting for money “at a game played with cards,” upon the ground that the indictment failed to set out the name of the game so played, is without merit. Woody v. State, 113 Ga. 927.

2. The alleged newly discovered evidence was cumulative in its character,, and the discretion of the trial judge in overruling the motion for a new trial on this ground will not be controlled.

3. There was sufficient evidence to warrant the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Woody v. State
39 S.E. 297 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 S.E. 750, 125 Ga. 788, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slade-v-state-ga-1906.