Slade v. State
54 S.E. 750, 125 Ga. 788, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 273
Opinion
1. A demurrer to an indictment which charged the accused with playing and betting for money “at a game played with cards,” upon the ground that the indictment failed to set out the name of the game so played, is without merit. Woody v. State, 113 Ga. 927.
2. The alleged newly discovered evidence was cumulative in its character,, and the discretion of the trial judge in overruling the motion for a new trial on this ground will not be controlled.
3. There was sufficient evidence to warrant the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Slade v. State, 54 S.E. 750, 125 Ga. 788, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 273 (Ga. 1906).
54 S.E. 750 (Slade v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Woody v. State
39 S.E. 297 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)