Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Slade v. State

Slade v. State

225 So. 3d 281, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11219, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1698
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 2, 2017
DocketNo. 4D17-957
StatusPublished

This text of 225 So. 3d 281 (Slade v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Slade v. State, 225 So. 3d 281, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11219, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1698 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Affirmed without prejudice to appellant’s right to refile his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence with supporting record documentation attached on his claim of an oral versus written sentencing discrepancy. Zill v. State, 162 So.3d 83 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

Gerber, C.J., .Ciklin and Forst, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Michael Darrin Zill v. State
162 So. 3d 83 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 So. 3d 281, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11219, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slade-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.