Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Slade v. State

Slade v. State

225 So. 3d 281, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11219, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1698
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Slade v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 250 So. 3d 682 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 2, 2017·No. No. 4D17-957·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Affirmed without prejudice to appellant’s right to refile his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence with supporting record documentation attached on his claim of an oral versus written sentencing discrepancy. Zill v. State, 162 So.3d 83 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

Gerber, C.J., .Ciklin and Forst, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Slade v. State, 225 So. 3d 281, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11219, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1698 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

225 So. 3d 281 (Slade v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Michael Darrin Zill v. State
162 So. 3d 83 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)