Slade v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Slade v. State

898 So. 2d 120, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2542, 2005 WL 475390

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 2, 2005

DocketNo. 4D03-2733

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 898 So. 2d 120 (Slade v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Slade v. State, 898 So. 2d 120, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2542, 2005 WL 475390 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant Curtis Slade’s conviction and sentence in all respects. We decline to accept appellee, State of Florida’s, concession of error based on Osborne v. State, 820 So.2d 1046 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). In this case, unlike Osborne, the trial court relied upon record evidence presented to the court in the form of certified copies of convictions and “original” court files. As the trial court then stated: “I don’t know how much better a record you can get than that. I find the official court [121]*121documents speak for themselves. And the court now declares Mr. Slade a habitual offender.”

AFFIRMED.

FARMER, C.J., and SHAHOOD, J., concur. TAYLOR, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant Curtis Slade’s conviction and sentence in all respects. We decline to accept appellee, State of Florida’s, concession of error based on Osborne v. State, 820 So.2d 1046 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). In this case, unlike Osborne, the trial court relied upon record evidence presented to the court in the form of certified copies of convictions and “original” court files. As the trial court then stated: “I don’t know how much better a record you can get than that. I find the official court [121]*121documents speak for themselves. And the court now declares Mr. Slade a habitual offender.”

AFFIRMED.

FARMER, C.J., and SHAHOOD, J., concur. TAYLOR, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

898 So. 2d 120, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2542, 2005 WL 475390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slade-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack