Slade v. Hale
This text of 82 N.Y.S. 1115 (Slade v. Hale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that the court has no jurisdiction of this action against the defendant as executrix; she being a foreign executrix, appointed and acting under the laws of the state of Illinois. Defendant, as such executrix, did not waive her objection to the jurisdiction of the court by appearing in the action and demurring for lack of jurisdiction. Flandrow v. Hammond, 13 App. Div. 325, 43 N. Y. Supp. 143; Wheelock v. Lee, 74 N. Y. 495. Also held, that this action is not maintainable against the defendant as executrix of an executor. Also held, that the complaint does not state, a cause of action against the defendant individually.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
82 N.Y.S. 1115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slade-v-hale-nyappdiv-1903.