Slade v. Hale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Slade v. Hale

82 N.Y.S. 1115

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 19, 1903·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that the court has no jurisdiction of this action against the defendant as executrix; she being a foreign executrix, appointed and acting under the laws of the state of Illinois. Defendant, as such executrix, did not waive her objection to the jurisdiction of the court by appearing in the action and demurring for lack of jurisdiction. Flandrow v. Hammond, 13 App. Div. 325, 43 N. Y. Supp. 143; Wheelock v. Lee, 74 N. Y. 495. Also held, that this action is not maintainable against the defendant as executrix of an executor. Also held, that the complaint does not state, a cause of action against the defendant individually.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that the court has no jurisdiction of this action against the defendant as executrix; she being a foreign executrix, appointed and acting under the laws of the state of Illinois. Defendant, as such executrix, did not waive her objection to the jurisdiction of the court by appearing in the action and demurring for lack of jurisdiction. Flandrow v. Hammond, 13 App. Div. 325, 43 N. Y. Supp. 143; Wheelock v. Lee, 74 N. Y. 495. Also held, that this action is not maintainable against the defendant as executrix of an executor. Also held, that the complaint does not state, a cause of action against the defendant individually.

Slade v. Hale, 82 N.Y.S. 1115 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

82 N.Y.S. 1115 (Slade v. Hale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related