Slade v. Griffin.

Superior Court of North Carolina

Slade v. Griffin.

3 N.C. 178

Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided April 5, 1802·Published

Opinion

\ f’CAT, Judge.

Admitting the plaintiff’s patent covers the JJfj- w?i©le land, the defendant’s title also covers a part of it, and. of this part the defendant has been in possession for more than 7 years. The plaintiff has been in possession all along of part of the land covered by his patent, but not in the actual possession of any part within the defendant’s deed, and in such case the act of limitations is a bar to the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

\ f’CAT, Judge.

Admitting the plaintiff’s patent covers the JJfj- w?i©le land, the defendant’s title also covers a part of it, and. of this part the defendant has been in possession for more than 7 years. The plaintiff has been in possession all along of part of the land covered by his patent, but not in the actual possession of any part within the defendant’s deed, and in such case the act of limitations is a bar to the plaintiff.

Slade v. Griffin., 3 N.C. 178 (N.C. Ct. App. 1802).

Pincite

3 N.C. 178 (Slade v. Griffin.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.