Slade v. Amerada Hess Corp.

304 A.D.2d 555, 756 N.Y.S.2d 907, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3664

This text of 304 A.D.2d 555 (Slade v. Amerada Hess Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Slade v. Amerada Hess Corp., 304 A.D.2d 555, 756 N.Y.S.2d 907, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3664 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Metro Affiliates, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), dated June 14, 2002, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and the third-party defendant Island Transportation Corporation separately appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of the same order as denied its cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff payable by the appellants.

The defendant Metro Affiliates, Inc., and the third-party defendant Island Transportation Corporation failed to demonstrate their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851 [1985]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the separate motions for summary judgment. Smith, J.P., McGinity, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zuckerman v. City of New York
404 N.E.2d 718 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Winegrad v. New York University Medical Center
476 N.E.2d 642 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
304 A.D.2d 555, 756 N.Y.S.2d 907, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slade-v-amerada-hess-corp-nyappdiv-2003.