Slack v. McDaniel

Supreme Court

Slack v. McDaniel

525 U.S. 1138

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedFebruary 22, 1999

DocketNo. 98-6322

StatusPublished

This text of 525 U.S. 1138 (Slack v. McDaniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Slack v. McDaniel, 525 U.S. 1138 (1999).

Pincite

Opinion

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: “If a person’s petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S. C. §2254 is dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies, and he subsequently exhausts his state remedies and refiles the §2254 petition, are claims included within that petition that were not included within his initial §2254 filing ‘second or successive’ ha-beas applications?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: “If a person’s petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S. C. §2254 is dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies, and he subsequently exhausts his state remedies and refiles the §2254 petition, are claims included within that petition that were not included within his initial §2254 filing ‘second or successive’ ha-beas applications?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

525 U.S. 1138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slack-v-mcdaniel-scotus-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack