Slaby v. Berkshire

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 2, 1997·No. 96-2352·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2352

ROBERT P. SLABY; LOUISE A. SLABY,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

WILLIAM D. BERKSHIRE; 1691 LIMITED PARTNER- SHIP; LANCER CORPORATION; CROFTON COUNTRY CLUB; JOHN DOE,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

WILLIAM SPORRE; MARK SPOLARICH; NEIL T. BELL,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Joseph H. Young, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-1633-Y)

Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 2, 1997

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert B. Slaby, Louise A. Slaby, Appellants Pro Se. Lynn T. Krause, KRAUSE & FERRIS, P.A., Annapolis, Maryland; Kathryn Miller Goldman, WEINER, ASTRACHAN, GUNST, HILLMAN & ALLEN, P.A., Balti- more, Maryland, for Appellees. 2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court's order entering judgment

for Appellees on Appellants' claim alleging discrimination in vio-

lation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101- 12213 (West 1995 & Supp. 1996). We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Slaby v. Berk-

shire, No. CA-94-1633-Y (D. Md. Aug. 6, 1996). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Slaby v. Berkshire, (4th Cir. 1997).

Slaby v. Berkshire (Slaby v. Berkshire) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Findings and purpose
42 U.S.C. § 12101