Slaby v. Berkshire
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2352
ROBERT P. SLABY; LOUISE A. SLABY,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
WILLIAM D. BERKSHIRE; 1691 LIMITED PARTNER- SHIP; LANCER CORPORATION; CROFTON COUNTRY CLUB; JOHN DOE,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
WILLIAM SPORRE; MARK SPOLARICH; NEIL T. BELL,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Joseph H. Young, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-1633-Y)
Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 2, 1997
Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert B. Slaby, Louise A. Slaby, Appellants Pro Se. Lynn T. Krause, KRAUSE & FERRIS, P.A., Annapolis, Maryland; Kathryn Miller Goldman, WEINER, ASTRACHAN, GUNST, HILLMAN & ALLEN, P.A., Balti- more, Maryland, for Appellees. 2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal the district court's order entering judgment
for Appellees on Appellants' claim alleging discrimination in vio-
lation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101- 12213 (West 1995 & Supp. 1996). We have reviewed the record and the
district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Slaby v. Berk-
shire, No. CA-94-1633-Y (D. Md. Aug. 6, 1996). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Slaby v. Berkshire (Slaby v. Berkshire) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.