Slabe v. Slabe
This text of 2023 Ohio 4485 (Slabe v. Slabe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as Slabe v. Slabe, 2023-Ohio-4485.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY
KIMBERLY SLABE, CASE NO. 2023-L-091
Plaintiff-Appellant, Civil Appeal from the - vs - Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division BRENDAN SLABE, et al.,
Defendant-Appellee. Trial Court No. 2021 DR 000508
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Decided: December 11, 2023 Judgment: Appeal dismissed
Kelley R. Tauring, Nicole A. Cruz, and Joseph G. Stafford, Stafford Law Co., L.P.A., North Point Tower, 1001 Lakeside Avenue, Suite 1300, Cleveland, OH 44114 (For Plaintiff-Appellant).
James L. Lane, Rosenthal Lane, LLC, North Point Tower, 1001 Lakeside Avenue, Suite 1720, Cleveland, OH 44114 (For Defendant-Appellee).
MARY JANE TRAPP, J.
{¶1} Appellant, Kimberly Slabe, through counsel, appeals the August 29, 2023
entry, in which the Lake County Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division,
found that the parties’ prenuptial agreement is valid and enforceable and any interest
appellee, Brendan Slabe, has in Slabe Machine Products Co. directly or by way of a trust
is his separate property. The court further stated that “[t]his determination is not a ruling
or decision on whether the Court should make a distributive award.” {¶2} Appellee moved to dismiss the appeal for lack of a final appealable order.
Appellant filed opposition.
{¶3} A trial court’s judgment is immediately appealable if it constitutes a final
order. Section 3(B)(2), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution; Gale v. Gale, 11th Dist. Lake
No. 2019-L-093, 2019-Ohio-5055, ¶ 3. If a lower court’s order is not final, an appellate
court has no jurisdiction, and the matter must be dismissed. Gen. Acc. Ins. Co. v. Ins. of
N. Am., 44 Ohio St.3d 17, 20 (1989). In the absence of other applicable authority
conferring jurisdiction, a judgment must satisfy R.C. 2505.02 to be final and appealable.
See Nelson v. Nelson, 11th Dist. Lake No. 2020-L-108, 2021-Ohio-33, ¶ 3.
{¶4} R.C. 2505.02(B) defines a final order as one of the following:
{¶5} “(1) An order that affects a substantial right in an action that in effect
determines the action and prevents a judgment;
{¶6} “(2) An order that affects a substantial right made in a special proceeding or
upon a summary application in an action after judgment;
{¶7} “(3) An order that vacates or sets aside a judgment or grants a new trial;
{¶8} “(4) An order that grants or denies a provisional remedy and to which both
of the following apply:
{¶9} “(a) The order in effect determines the action with respect to the provisional
remedy and prevents a judgment in the action in favor of the appealing party with respect
to the provisional remedy.
{¶10} “(b) The appealing party would not be afforded a meaningful or effective
remedy by an appeal following final judgment as to all proceedings, issues, claims, and
parties in the action.
Case No. 2023-L-091 {¶11} “(5) An order that determines that an action may or may not be maintained
as a class action;
{¶12} “(6) An order determining the constitutionality of any changes to the Revised
Code * * *;
{¶13} “(7) An order in an appropriation proceeding * * *.”
{¶14} Here, the August 29, 2023 entry does not fit within any of the categories for
being a final order pursuant to R.C. 2505.02(B). Also, no divorce decree has been issued.
{¶15} In a divorce action, generally, no final appealable order exists until all issues
relating to property division, support and parental rights and responsibilities have been
addressed. Miller v. Miller, 11th Dist. Portage No. 2003-P-0065, 2003-Ohio-6765, at ¶ 3.
An entry that leaves issues unresolved and contemplates further action is not final.
Montalbine v. Montalbine, 11th Dist. Lake No. 2022-L-020, 2022-Ohio-1464, ¶ 14. Since
the entry on appeal leaves issues unresolved and further action is contemplated, this
court is without jurisdiction to consider the merits. Appellant will have a meaningful and
effective remedy by means of an appeal once a final judgment is reached.
{¶16} Based upon the foregoing analysis, the judgment of the trial court is not a
final appealable order. Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and this
appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
{¶17} Appeal dismissed.
JOHN J. EKLUND, P.J.,
MATT LYNCH, J.,
concur.
Case No. 2023-L-091
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2023 Ohio 4485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slabe-v-slabe-ohioctapp-2023.