S.L. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

S.L. v. State

137 So. 3d 445, 2014 WL 940688, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3457

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 12, 2014

DocketNo. 4D12-2425

StatusPublished

This text of 137 So. 3d 445 (S.L. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

S.L. v. State, 137 So. 3d 445, 2014 WL 940688, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3457 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

CONCESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

A juvenile appeals his disposition order and sentence. The State concedes that the trial court fundamentally erred in revoking the juvenile’s probation in Case Number 10-2213DL because no formal affidavit/petition of violation of probation was filed in that case. See Saintiler v. State, 109 So.3d 303, 304 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); see also Johnston v. State, 684 So.2d 262, 263 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (holding that an order revoking probation should be vacated if no formal charge of violation of probation has been filed, and that this issue may be raised for the first time on appeal as fundamental error). We thus reverse and remand for the reinstatement of the withheld adjudication and disposition of probation in Case Number 10-2213DL only. We affirm in all other respects.

Affirmed in part, Reversed in part, and Remanded with instructions.

WARNER, FORST and KLINGENSMITH, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CONCESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

A juvenile appeals his disposition order and sentence. The State concedes that the trial court fundamentally erred in revoking the juvenile’s probation in Case Number 10-2213DL because no formal affidavit/petition of violation of probation was filed in that case. See Saintiler v. State, 109 So.3d 303, 304 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); see also Johnston v. State, 684 So.2d 262, 263 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (holding that an order revoking probation should be vacated if no formal charge of violation of probation has been filed, and that this issue may be raised for the first time on appeal as fundamental error). We thus reverse and remand for the reinstatement of the withheld adjudication and disposition of probation in Case Number 10-2213DL only. We affirm in all other respects.

Affirmed in part, Reversed in part, and Remanded with instructions.

WARNER, FORST and KLINGENSMITH, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 So. 3d 445, 2014 WL 940688, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sl-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack