S.L v. a minor, by ANIKO VIGI, as natural guardian, etc. v. ARPAD TOTH

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in S.L v. a minor, by ANIKO VIGI, as natural guardian, etc. v. ARPAD TOTH. Read the opinion of the Court — 268 So. 3d 801
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 13, 2019·No. 18-1578·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

S.L.V., a minor, by ANIKO VIGI, as natural guardian and next friend and third-party, and ANIKO VIGI, individually, Appellants,

v.

ARPAD TOTH, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1578

[February 13, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Edward A. Garrison, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2017-CA- 000637-XXXX-MB.

Peter J. Snyder of Peter J. Snyder, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellants.

Arpad Toth, Boca Raton, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1980).

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

S.L v. a minor, by ANIKO VIGI, as natural guardian, etc. v. ARPAD TOTH, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

S.L v. a minor, by ANIKO VIGI, as natural guardian, etc. v. ARPAD TOTH (S.L v. a minor, by ANIKO VIGI, as natural guardian, etc. v. ARPAD TOTH) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)