Skyway Capital Management, LLC v. Brenda Gant

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
• Decided: May 15, 2025
• Docket: 25-10821
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 25-10821 Document: 7-1 Date Filed: 05/15/2025 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 25-10821 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

SKYWAY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BRENDA GANT,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:24-cv-02143-MSS-AEP ____________________ USCA11 Case: 25-10821 Document: 7-1 Date Filed: 05/15/2025 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 25-10821

Before JILL PRYOR, GRANT, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. Brenda Gant, proceeding pro se, appeals from the district court’s order remanding her case to Florida state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We lack jurisdiction to review the re- mand order. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c)-(d) (generally barring review of orders remanding cases removed from state court); Whole Health Chiropractic & Wellness, Inc. v. Humana Med Plan, Inc., 254 F.3d 1317, 1319 (11th Cir. 2001) (explaining that remand orders are only re- viewable if, as relevant here, they are based on grounds other than lack of subject matter jurisdiction); New v. Sports & Recreation, 114 F.3d 1092, 1095-96 (11th Cir. 1997) (explaining that “a district court does not have to expressly state its reliance on section 1447(c) to preclude appellate review”). Additionally, the notice of removal did not invoke 28 U.S.C. §§ 1442 or 1443 as a basis for removal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d); BP P.L.C. v. Mayor and City Council of Balt., 141 S. Ct. 1532, 1538 (2021). No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.