Skytrack Condominium Board of Managers v. Windberk Partners
This text of 167 A.D.2d 381 (Skytrack Condominium Board of Managers v. Windberk Partners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for breach of contract, the defendants Windberk Partners, Ruben Windmiller, Irving Berk, Fred Wichler, Martyn and Don Weston, and Marvin Schwartz appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Golden, J.), dated December 1, 1988, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Assuming that Skytrack Condominium’s initial board of managers was improperly constituted, as the appellants contend, we nevertheless find that the board’s decision to commence the instant action, arguably voidable, was ratified by the subsequent acts of a majority of the condominium’s unit owners and by a properly constituted board of managers (see, Godley v Crandall & Godley Co., 212 NY 121, 131; Polchinski Co. v Cemetery Floral Co., 79 AD2d 648, 649; see generally, Holm v C.M.P. Sheet Metal, 89 AD2d 229, 232-233; 57 NY Jur 2d, Estoppel, Ratification, and Waiver, § 76).
We have considered the appellants’ remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Eiber, J. P., Harwood, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
167 A.D.2d 381, 561 N.Y.S.2d 608, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skytrack-condominium-board-of-managers-v-windberk-partners-nyappdiv-1990.