Skytrack Condominium Board of Managers v. Windberk Partners

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Skytrack Condominium Board of Managers v. Windberk Partners

167 A.D.2d 381, 561 N.Y.S.2d 608, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13648

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 1990·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for breach of contract, the defendants Windberk Partners, Ruben Windmiller, Irving Berk, Fred Wichler, Martyn and Don Weston, and Marvin Schwartz appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Golden, J.), dated December 1, 1988, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Assuming that Skytrack Condominium’s initial board of managers was improperly constituted, as the appellants contend, we nevertheless find that the board’s decision to commence the instant action, arguably voidable, was ratified by the subsequent acts of a majority of the condominium’s unit owners and by a properly constituted board of managers (see, Godley v Crandall & Godley Co., 212 NY 121, 131; Polchinski Co. v Cemetery Floral Co., 79 AD2d 648, 649; see generally, Holm v C.M.P. Sheet Metal, 89 AD2d 229, 232-233; 57 NY Jur 2d, Estoppel, Ratification, and Waiver, § 76).

We have considered the appellants’ remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Eiber, J. P., Harwood, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for breach of contract, the defendants Windberk Partners, Ruben Windmiller, Irving Berk, Fred Wichler, Martyn and Don Weston, and Marvin Schwartz appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Golden, J.), dated December 1, 1988, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Assuming that Skytrack Condominium’s initial board of managers was improperly constituted, as the appellants contend, we nevertheless find that the board’s decision to commence the instant action, arguably voidable, was ratified by the subsequent acts of a majority of the condominium’s unit owners and by a properly constituted board of managers (see, Godley v Crandall & Godley Co., 212 NY 121, 131; Polchinski Co. v Cemetery Floral Co., 79 AD2d 648, 649; see generally, Holm v C.M.P. Sheet Metal, 89 AD2d 229, 232-233; 57 NY Jur 2d, Estoppel, Ratification, and Waiver, § 76).

We have considered the appellants’ remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Eiber, J. P., Harwood, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Skytrack Condominium Board of Managers v. Windberk Partners, 167 A.D.2d 381, 561 N.Y.S.2d 608, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13648 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

167 A.D.2d 381 (Skytrack Condominium Board of Managers v. Windberk Partners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related