Skyline Vineyards, Inc. v. Moravec

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Skyline Vineyards, Inc. v. Moravec

134 A.D.2d 822, 522 N.Y.S.2d 37, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50972

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 1987

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 134 A.D.2d 822 (Skyline Vineyards, Inc. v. Moravec) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Skyline Vineyards, Inc. v. Moravec, 134 A.D.2d 822, 522 N.Y.S.2d 37, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50972 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Yates County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: The court erred in its determination that a forklift truck and clamp attachment levied upon by the Sheriff could be sold to satisfy respondent’s judgment against Villa D’lngianni Winery. The evidence before the court in this proceeding commenced pursuant to CPLR 5239 demonstrated that petitioner was the owner of the forklift truck and respondent’s conclusory allegations failed to raise a question of fact on this issue. Therefore, petitioner’s application seeking possession of the forklift truck is granted.

In our view, however, the proof submitted by the parties did not support a summary disposition as to ownership of the clamp attachment. Petitioner alleged that the truck and the clamp were considered to be one unit, but respondent submitted proof that the clamp had been purchased separately by Villa D’lngianni Winery several years before the forklift truck was first leased. Therefore, the matter is remitted to Supreme Court for a separate trial to determine ownership of the clamp attachment. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Yates County, Dugan, J. — levy property.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Pine and Lawton, Order

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Yates County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: The court erred in its determination that a forklift truck and clamp attachment levied upon by the Sheriff could be sold to satisfy respondent’s judgment against Villa D’lngianni Winery. The evidence before the court in this proceeding commenced pursuant to CPLR 5239 demonstrated that petitioner was the owner of the forklift truck and respondent’s conclusory allegations failed to raise a question of fact on this issue. Therefore, petitioner’s application seeking possession of the forklift truck is granted.

In our view, however, the proof submitted by the parties did not support a summary disposition as to ownership of the clamp attachment. Petitioner alleged that the truck and the clamp were considered to be one unit, but respondent submitted proof that the clamp had been purchased separately by Villa D’lngianni Winery several years before the forklift truck was first leased. Therefore, the matter is remitted to Supreme Court for a separate trial to determine ownership of the clamp attachment. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Yates County, Dugan, J. — levy property.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Pine and Lawton, Order

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 A.D.2d 822, 522 N.Y.S.2d 37, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skyline-vineyards-inc-v-moravec-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack