Skyler McMillion v. J. Doer, et al.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided September 24, 2025·No. 1:24-cv-01557·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SKYLER McMILLION, No. 1:24-cv-01557-KES-SAB (PC) 8 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED 9 v. (ECF No. 20) 10 J. DOER, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights complaint pursuant 15 | to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 16 On July 29, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff complaint, found no cognizable claims, and 17 | granted Plaintiff the opportunity to amend the complaint. (ECF No. 20.) Plaintiff has not filed an 1g | amended complaint or otherwise communicated with the Court and the time to do so has passed. 19 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause within fourteen (14) days 0 from the date of service of this order why this action should not be dismissed for failure to state a 4 cognizable claim. Plaintiffs failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation to dismiss the action. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 ot Dated: _ September 24, 2025 25 STANLEY A. BOONE 6 United States Magistrate Judge 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Skyler McMillion v. J. Doer, et al., (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Skyler McMillion v. J. Doer, et al. (Skyler McMillion v. J. Doer, et al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related