Skyler McMillion v. J. Doer, et al.
This text of Skyler McMillion v. J. Doer, et al. (Skyler McMillion v. J. Doer, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SKYLER McMILLION, No. 1:24-cv-01557-KES-SAB (PC) 8 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED 9 v. (ECF No. 20) 10 J. DOER, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights complaint pursuant 15 | to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 16 On July 29, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff complaint, found no cognizable claims, and 17 | granted Plaintiff the opportunity to amend the complaint. (ECF No. 20.) Plaintiff has not filed an 1g | amended complaint or otherwise communicated with the Court and the time to do so has passed. 19 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause within fourteen (14) days 0 from the date of service of this order why this action should not be dismissed for failure to state a 4 cognizable claim. Plaintiffs failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation to dismiss the action. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 ot Dated: _ September 24, 2025 25 STANLEY A. BOONE 6 United States Magistrate Judge 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Skyler McMillion v. J. Doer, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skyler-mcmillion-v-j-doer-et-al-caed-2025.