Skundor v. Gandee

Fourth Circuit

Skundor v. Gandee

96 F. App'x 923

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 20, 2004·No. No. 04-6502·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

David Skundor appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Skundor v. Gandee, No. CA-02-499 (S.D.W.Va. Mar. 11, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

David Skundor appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Skundor v. Gandee, No. CA-02-499 (S.D.W.Va. Mar. 11, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Skundor v. Gandee, 96 F. App'x 923 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

96 F. App'x 923 (Skundor v. Gandee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related