Skullestad v. State

766 So. 2d 347, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8249, 2000 WL 873333
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Skullestad v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 790 So. 2d 516
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 5, 2000·No. No. 4D00-1561·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final order summarily denying appellant Ralph E. Skullestad’s motion for postconviction relief is affirmed, without prejudice to his right to refile in the circuit court within thirty (30) days of the date of this opinion a duly verified second amended motion which comports with the verification requirements of Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and 3.987.

This second amended motion shall be limited to the claims previously raised by appellant in his original and amended motion for post-conviction relief, and shall address whether the cause is moot in light of the state’s assertion that a motion to mitigate sentencing has been heard and resolves the issues presented herein.

AFFIRMED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

GUNTHER, POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Skullestad v. State, 766 So. 2d 347, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8249, 2000 WL 873333 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

766 So. 2d 347 (Skullestad v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.