Skubal v. Cooley

639 So. 2d 1126, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7428, 1994 WL 386639
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 27, 1994·No. No. 93-2249·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By granting appellees’ motion for judgment on the pleadings, the trial court entered a final order dismissing appellant Skubal’s counterclaim. To so rule, the court considered factual matters outside the pleadings. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.100(a) (defining “pleadings”). A motion for judgment on the pleadings under rule 1.140(c), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure must be decided on the pleadings, without reference to facts which may be properly considered under other procedural vehicles. E.g., J & J Utility Co. v. Windmill Village by the Sea Condominium No. I Ass’n, 485 So.2d 36 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). Accordingly, the order appealed from is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

[1127] KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., and GROSS, ROBERT M., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Skubal v. Cooley, 639 So. 2d 1126, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7428, 1994 WL 386639 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

639 So. 2d 1126 (Skubal v. Cooley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ray v. Elks Lodge 1870 of Stuart
649 So. 2d 292 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)