Skromak v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Skromak v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.

187 A.D.2d 422

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 2, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 187 A.D.2d 422 (Skromak v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Skromak v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 187 A.D.2d 422 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Williams, J.), dated April 3, 1990, which denied his motion for leave to serve an amended complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We find no improvident exercise of discretion in the Supreme Court’s denial of the plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve an amended complaint, under all of the circumstances of this case. Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Williams, J.), dated April 3, 1990, which denied his motion for leave to serve an amended complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We find no improvident exercise of discretion in the Supreme Court’s denial of the plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve an amended complaint, under all of the circumstances of this case. Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 A.D.2d 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skromak-v-helmsley-spear-inc-nyappdiv-1992.