Skrmetti v. Marodis

Mississippi Supreme Court

Skrmetti v. Marodis

186 So. 2d 775, 1966 Miss. LEXIS 1334

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedMay 30, 1966

DocketNo. 44027

StatusPublished

This text of 186 So. 2d 775 (Skrmetti v. Marodis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Skrmetti v. Marodis, 186 So. 2d 775, 1966 Miss. LEXIS 1334 (Mich. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

BRADY, Justice:

We have carefully read all of the testimony in this cause, examined all exhibits, and studied the briefs of counsel representing complainant and defendant. Although the trial of this case presented sundry difficulties, nevertheless the defendant, Paul M. Skrmetti, who represented himself, a precarious endeavor at best, effectively presented the redundant evidence in support of his contentions.

Under the pleadings and under the proof in this case, we are led to the inescapable conclusion that the findings of the learned chancellor and the decree entered in this cause are eminently correct. The cause is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

ETHRIDGE, C. J., and RODGERS, JONES and ROBERTSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRADY, Justice:

We have carefully read all of the testimony in this cause, examined all exhibits, and studied the briefs of counsel representing complainant and defendant. Although the trial of this case presented sundry difficulties, nevertheless the defendant, Paul M. Skrmetti, who represented himself, a precarious endeavor at best, effectively presented the redundant evidence in support of his contentions.

Under the pleadings and under the proof in this case, we are led to the inescapable conclusion that the findings of the learned chancellor and the decree entered in this cause are eminently correct. The cause is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

ETHRIDGE, C. J., and RODGERS, JONES and ROBERTSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 So. 2d 775, 1966 Miss. LEXIS 1334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skrmetti-v-marodis-miss-1966.